The B.C. Court of Appeal recently gave employers a much-needed reminder: they’re entitled to reasonable notice too.
While most employees are familiar with the fact that they are entitled to reasonable notice if they’re terminated without cause, employers sometimes forget that the obligation works both ways. An employee cannot simply stop showing up to work without giving their employer time to prepare for the employee’s departure.
In Consbec v Walker, the Court of Appeal considered the case of Peter Walker, a former employee of Consbec Inc., a blasting and drilling company operating throughout Canada. While working as Consbec’s only employee in its Kamloops’ office, Walker abruptly quit one day in June of 2002, leaving the office for good without having given Consbec any prior warning. Walker incorporated a competitor company a month later.
A lower court initially awarded Consbec $56,116.11 in damages for Walker’s failure to give the company notice. Ultimately, the Court of Appeal scaled this amount back. The Court ruled that an employee who quits without giving notice is only responsible for those damages that flow from his or her failure to give notice – they are not on the hook for all the costs associated with their resignation in general. Importantly, in its decision, the Court of Appeal determined that Walker legally owed his employer a reasonable notice of one month before leaving.
Still, the end result of the case does shed light on why employers don’t usually bother pursuing these types of claims. The Court of Appeal ultimately found that the reasonable costs that Consbec incurred, from sending a last-minute employee to Kamloops to fill in for Walker, were more than offset by the money the company saved not paying Walker’s salary for a month. Thus, the damage award was set aside.
So, employers should beware. If they’ve been left in the lurch by an employee, they do have potential recourse. However, it’s important that they seriously consider whether a former employee’s wrongful quitting actually cost them enough to justify a legal proceeding. Otherwise, an employer can only hope for – at most – a symbolic victory.
Written with the assistance of John Schudlo, articling student.
About Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm. We provide the world’s preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have 3800 lawyers and other legal staff based in more than 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.
For more information about Norton Rose Fulbright, see nortonrosefulbright.com/legal-notices.
Law around the world
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.